FATF meeting: Is India an obstacle for Pakistan to get out of the gray list?
Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi has said that India wants to use the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) forum "for political purposes" and that India should not be allowed to use the forum politically.
In a statement, the Pakistani foreign
minister said, "The FATF is a technical forum that should not be used to
deal with political issues."
Keep in mind that Pakistan is among the gray
list countries and the Pakistani government is waiting for relief from the
FATF. But the foreign minister's statement complicates matters.
The FATF's plenary meeting on June 25 will
decide whether to keep Pakistan on the gray list. The opinion
of many experts and analysts in Pakistan indicates that Pakistan will be kept
on the gray list with a little more flexibility, as has been the case in
previous FATF meetings. However, the final announcement has to be made by the
FATF itself.
Is India an
obstacle to getting out of Pakistan's gray list?
Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi's statement on India ahead of the FATF meeting, which is currently reviewing the situation in Pakistan, has been the focus of attention, in which he has pointed to India's global "political role". Statements about it have been made before.
Now the question is to what extent can India
influence Paki "(India) cannot be stopped legally," said Haroon Sharif,
a former head of the Board of Investment. But the current situation seems to be
going against Pakistan.
He pointed out two things: "Forums like
FATF are technical. And they should be left as they are. Because not doing so
is not good for the FATF's own reputation. Otherwise, the trust in the
institutions will be eroded, which is happening because politics is being used.
Secondly, he said that Pakistan should have a
representative or spokesperson for the FATF. He is referring to the fact that
several government ministers are giving their views on this sensitive issue at
the same time.stan's case in the FATF and can India be stopped legally?
"What is happening now is that many
spokesmen and ministers are responding to political statements on the
FATF," he said. This weakens our case in the eyes of the international
community and benefits both parties. "
The BBC's Shakeel Akhtar in Delhi says that
for the past three years, Indian media and statements from top officials
suggest that Indian diplomats have been lobbying against Pakistan in both the
Asia-Pacific Group and the FATF. ۔
Pakistan is a member of the Asia-Pacific
Group but is not a member of the 40-member FATF where the final decision is
made. India is a member.
Sushant Sareen, India's security analyst,
says member countries cannot leak any consultations and discussions in the FATF
outside the forum. "Therefore, all the news that comes from there comes
through 'sources'. No country talks about it directly.
Sushant added that India certainly lobbies
for the prevention of terrorism but Pakistan also lobbies for a decision in its
favor. This means that every country is active for its own benefit at some
level.
What has been happening at the FATF meeting so far?
Although the Asia Pacific Group (APG), which
monitors money laundering, suggested more surveillance to Pakistan in its
second follow-up report, it also appreciated Pakistan's compliance with the
recommendations.
According to the report, the agency had urged
Pakistan in its February meeting to implement three key recommendations,
including punishing terrorists, prosecuting them and restricting financial
assistance.
The agency also sought evidence from Pakistan
on the legal application of the ban on terrorist financing. As evidence,
Pakistan's federal government submitted a report in May detailing operations
against 12 terrorist organizations.
The June 25 meeting is significant for
Pakistan because Pakistan believes that after implementing most of the recommendations,
it is time to do more or remove the Dow Moore sword from Pakistan.
But now Pakistan's foreign minister is
voicing concerns about India lest the body, which talks on technical issues,
fall victim to political and diplomatic squabbles.
No comments:
Post a Comment